The 100 most influential people american voices finding home the influencers looking forward next generation leaders person of the year top of the world dred scott v sanford in the case of dred scott v sanford, the united states supreme court declared that all blacks — regardless of whether they were slaves or free men — were. In 1857, the supreme court announced their judgement of the dred scott v sanford case, deciding the constitutionality of the extension of slavery into the territories and demonstrating that the court enjoyed no special immunity from the sectional and partisan passions that convulsed the land.
The decision of scott v sanford, considered by legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the supreme court, was overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the united states to be citizens of the united states. Instead, in 1857, in the case of dred scott v sanford , the united states supreme court declared that all blacks — regardless of whether they were slaves or free men — were not and could never become citizens of the united states. The dred scott decision was the culmination of the case of dred scott v sanford, one of the most controversial events preceding the civil war in march 1857, the supreme court issued its decision in that case, which had been brought before the court by dred scott, a slave who had lived with his owner in a free state before returning to the slave state of missouri.
Start studying important supreme court cases learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools the significance of the supreme court case marbury v madison is that the decision 1) advanced civil rights for minorities the supreme court ruling in dred scott v sanford (1857) helped to increase sectional. The supreme court's decision in dred scott v sandford is unanimously denounced by modern scholars many contemporary lawyers, and most modern legal scholars, consider the ruling regarding slavery in the territories to be obiter dictum and not a binding precedent. In dred scott v sandford, scott argued that because his master had taken him to illinois, a free state, and wisconsin, a free territory according to the missouri compromise of 1820, he and his family were free.
Many constitutional scholars consider the supreme court’s ruling in the dred scott case—formally dred scott v john fa sandford —to be the worst decision ever rendered by the court in particular, it has been cited as the most egregious example in the history of the court, wrongly imposing a judicial solution on a political problem. Scott was represented before the us supreme court by montgomery blair, an abolitionist who later joined abraham lincoln's cabinet as postmaster general, and george curtis, whose brother benjamin sat on the supreme court and wrote one of the two dissents in dred scott v sandford.